Who Wore It Better? Hollywood Life

Lets first start with Raquel. The actress, now 74, originally wore a fur bikini in one of her most iconic roles in Hollywood in the 1966 film,One Million Years B.C.Her look in the film became one of the mot talked about fashion looks of the 1960s, andpaved the way for women to wear two piece

Raquel Welch & Kim Kardashian Fur Bikini: Who Wore It Better?

Let’s first start with Raquel. The actress, now 74, originally wore a fur bikini in one of her most iconic roles in Hollywood in the 1966 film, One Million Years B.C. Her look in the film became one of the mot talked about fashion looks of the 1960s, and paved the way for women to wear two piece bathing suits.

Kim, 34, modernized Raquel’s look, by showing off more skin than Raquel. The brunette reality star dressed in the skimpy fur bikini showing off her amazing body, and paired it with huge fur boots. Kim’s daring look was by far one of her sexiest, standing in the snow wearing the tiny suit.

While we love both of these looks, they are completely different. Raquel’s look was of course, daring for the 1960s and is an iconic fashion staple, but Kim certainly just radiates sex appeal. What do you think?

Kim Kardashian’s Fur Bikini: Kim Rocks ‘Furkini’ By Kanye West In Sexy New Pics

The mastermind behind Kim’s furkini is none other than her hubby, Kanye WestWhen Kim posted the pics on her Instagram, she was sure to give her loving husband credit where it was due. “Furkini by Kanye West,” she captioned the closeup photo of her baring her chest.

So, HollywoodLifers, it’s time to let us know: Who do YOU think wore the fur bikini better, Kim or Raquel? Vote in our poll and drop a comment below!

— Julianne Ishler

ncG1vNJzZmign6G5usPOqJuloZaae6S7zGhpaWllZH1ye5FqZquZoaqyrXnWnqOsoF2gtq55ypqpnZmjnbaiuoyfrKtlkp64qrrIZq2orJVivaqv0mg%3D

 Share!